<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>NOPR Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/12442" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/12442</id>
  <updated>2026-10-09T23:04:53Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-10-09T23:04:53Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>TRIPS, WTO and IPR: IPA 2005: Potential for Disputes and Litigation</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/12450" />
    <author>
      <name>Nair, M D</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/12450</id>
    <updated>2011-07-29T16:30:49Z</updated>
    <published>2011-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: TRIPS, WTO and IPR: IPA 2005: Potential for Disputes and Litigation
Authors: Nair, M D
Abstract: The World Trade Organization (WTO) was set&#xD;
up in 1995 and has been the custodian of all matters related to implementation&#xD;
of the TRIPS Agreement endorsed by 153 member countries. WTO is therefore the&#xD;
most important body which monitors and influences working of global&#xD;
intellectual property rights protection in all its member countries. This&#xD;
opinion discusses IPA 2005 and its potential for disputes and litigation.
Page(s): 351-353</summary>
    <dc:date>2011-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Intellection of Trade Secret and Innovation Laws in India</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/12449" />
    <author>
      <name>Nomani, Md Zafar Mahfooz</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Rahman, Faizanur</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/12449</id>
    <updated>2011-07-23T16:30:43Z</updated>
    <published>2011-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Intellection of Trade Secret and Innovation Laws in India
Authors: Nomani, Md Zafar Mahfooz; Rahman, Faizanur
Abstract: The uniqueness of trade secret law is that it fits into the extensive&#xD;
framework of contract, competition, innovation and intellectual property&#xD;
rights. The trade secret doctrines are closely linked to the domain of tort and&#xD;
criminal law although subject to different rationalizations. The remedial part&#xD;
of the law is inconsistent with the cause of action. The varied nature of trade&#xD;
secret calls for its holistic comprehension as a form of intellectual property.&#xD;
An incentive based approach in granting legal protection to trade secret harnesses&#xD;
the idea, inventions, and utility patent. This is best suited to varied&#xD;
categories of innovators and inventors in a post liberalized Indian economy and&#xD;
TRIPS compliance. The paper traces evolution and development of trade secret&#xD;
law in a comparative perspective and critically analyses the potential impact&#xD;
of innovation law on trade secret protection in the context of national&#xD;
innovation policy and laws of India.
Page(s): 341-350</summary>
    <dc:date>2011-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cinematographic Lyricists Right to Royalty: Myth or Reality?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/12448" />
    <author>
      <name>Dahiya, Kirti</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/12448</id>
    <updated>2011-07-24T16:30:43Z</updated>
    <published>2011-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Cinematographic Lyricists Right to Royalty: Myth or Reality?
Authors: Dahiya, Kirti
Abstract: This paper deals with the issue of a&#xD;
cinematographic lyricist’s right to copyright royalty after the producer of a&#xD;
film has been assigned the right. The position of law in India is not in favour&#xD;
of writers, who are often marginalized and cut-out from a share in the profits&#xD;
by generally exploitative and unfavourable terms of a contract. In the light of&#xD;
the same, the author’s view is that an amendment to the Copyright Act was long&#xD;
overdue and the Copyright (Amendment) Bill, 2010 is an affirmative step by the&#xD;
government to correct inequitable balance of interests that has plagued the&#xD;
Indian film industry. In order to arrive at a deeper understanding of the&#xD;
matter, reliance needs to be placed on the stand taken by the Indian judiciary&#xD;
with respect to the right of authors over lyrics used in songs in&#xD;
cinematographic vehicles. Recourse will also be taken to considerations on the&#xD;
basis of which the Bill is being pushed. An analysis of the lacunae that may&#xD;
exist even if the reforms are brought to fruition is concluded with certain&#xD;
suggestions to overcome them.
Page(s): 335-340</summary>
    <dc:date>2011-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>FDI Flows into the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry: An Analysis of Trends  and Constraints</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/12447" />
    <author>
      <name>Tripathy, Ishita G</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Yadav, Surendra S</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Sharma, Seema</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/12447</id>
    <updated>2011-07-24T16:30:42Z</updated>
    <published>2011-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: FDI Flows into the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry: An Analysis of Trends  and Constraints
Authors: Tripathy, Ishita G; Yadav, Surendra S; Sharma, Seema
Abstract: India’s&#xD;
economic reforms since 1990s and World Trade Organisation’s Agreement on&#xD;
Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights have caused significant&#xD;
changes in the operational environment of the Indian pharmaceutical industry&#xD;
(IPI). In this backdrop, this study examines the Foreign Direct Investment&#xD;
(FDI) flows into the firms of IPI. It finds that the amount of FDI, the number of FDI recipient firms and the number&#xD;
of source countries of FDI are larger during the product patent regime as&#xD;
compared to the process patent regime. The factor analysis of primary data&#xD;
presents the perception of 64 sample firms of IPI as regards the main&#xD;
constraints of FDI inflows in the&#xD;
product patent regime.
Page(s): 330-334</summary>
    <dc:date>2011-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

