<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>NOPR Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/19455" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/19455</id>
  <updated>2026-10-10T22:21:25Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-10-10T22:21:25Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Implications of WTO on Agriculture*</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/19474" />
    <author>
      <name>Vasudeva, P K</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/19474</id>
    <updated>2016-07-20T04:29:45Z</updated>
    <published>2001-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Implications of WTO on Agriculture*
Authors: Vasudeva, P K
Abstract: The Agreement on Agriculture (AoA) drawn up&#xD;
when the World Trade Organization came into force six years ago in 1 January&#xD;
1995 is inequitable and heavily loaded in favour of developed countries. Though&#xD;
the developing countries expected to gain handsomely from the multilateral trade&#xD;
agreement in agricultural products, they have hardly anything to cheer about.&#xD;
The government should, in the next Ministerial Conference in Doha impress upon the developed countries the&#xD;
need to rewrite certain clauses of the AoA to make it fair and non-discriminatory&#xD;
which is the spirit of WTO. The three Bills - the Indian Patents Act, 1970 (Second&#xD;
Amendment) Bill 1999, Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Bill&#xD;
2000, and Biological Diversity Bill 2000- which are with the Joint Members of&#xD;
the Parliament for their suitable recommendations in conformation to TRIPS&#xD;
Agreement should be passed as early as possible so that we do not fall behind in&#xD;
the competition with the rest of the countries. As it is, the foreign&#xD;
countrymen are depriving us of our bio-wealth by patenting our&#xD;
&#xD;
rich biodiversity.
Page(s): 301-311</summary>
    <dc:date>2001-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Possible Indian Response to Software and Business Method Patenting</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/19473" />
    <author>
      <name>Banerjee, Parthasarathi</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/19473</id>
    <updated>2016-07-20T04:29:06Z</updated>
    <published>2001-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: A Possible Indian Response to Software and Business Method Patenting
Authors: Banerjee, Parthasarathi
Abstract: US courts have granted&#xD;
patents in software, internet-based business and on business methods. Such&#xD;
grants have serious consequences on both Indian and global business, and on the&#xD;
current potential and future status of competition and inventions. Often the&#xD;
courts or the patent offices overlooked existence of prior arts, or else&#xD;
granted patents with such very wide scope as would surely curb inventive and&#xD;
competitive activities. Issuance of IPR in these areas appears to be clearly&#xD;
headed for a new industrial organization and for a thorough dismantling of&#xD;
current industrial organization. In view of this, interested agents from India including its software companies, its patent&#xD;
office and its government must initiate representation to the USPTO on the existence&#xD;
of prior arts, to the US&#xD;
courts on the injuries to inventiveness and to competition that such grants&#xD;
might bring. The introduction of a jury system with both patent office and the&#xD;
courts are suggested where the competitors to a claimed patent&#xD;
&#xD;
can be represented. Indian government&#xD;
must also bring these issues to the TRIPS rounds and to the WIPO. A jury system&#xD;
and a harmonized examination system should be part of the new negotiations at&#xD;
the TRIPS.
Page(s): 292-300</summary>
    <dc:date>2001-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Functional Foods — The IPR Angle</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/19472" />
    <author>
      <name>Krishna, G A</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Prakash, V</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/19472</id>
    <updated>2016-07-20T04:28:12Z</updated>
    <published>2001-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Functional Foods — The IPR Angle
Authors: Krishna, G A; Prakash, V
Abstract: As the health and safety aspects of foods&#xD;
become very important, the importance of functional food is reaching to higher&#xD;
heights. The functional food even though appears to be of recent origin, has history&#xD;
and origin of some of the active ingredients being present in traditional, ethnic&#xD;
and in conventional food in different countries. This raises a very important&#xD;
question from IPR angle of how one can on the one hand protect the traditional&#xD;
knowledge and on the other hand give credit to innovators who show the functional&#xD;
attributes of a food by isolating a biomolecule. It is this aspect that requires&#xD;
an analysis in terms of the source of such functional food and additives, the guidelines&#xD;
on health claims and the need to correlate the end result of claimed functionality&#xD;
through the technological intervention especially from a commercial angle of&#xD;
the functional food in this competitive market. The article addresses these issues&#xD;
from various angles.
Page(s): 286-291</summary>
    <dc:date>2001-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Managing Software Protection</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/19471" />
    <author>
      <name>Gupta, V K</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/19471</id>
    <updated>2016-07-20T04:27:43Z</updated>
    <published>2001-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Managing Software Protection
Authors: Gupta, V K
Abstract: The software firms and R&amp;D&#xD;
organizations need a strategy for software protection. This paper discusses&#xD;
some of the issues with regard to software patenting, copyright, and trade secrets.&#xD;
Elaborates an approach to establish software piracy. It considers the ways and&#xD;
means to manage software protection and highlights critical aspects that need&#xD;
to be addressed including the need to develop understanding of the legal means of&#xD;
protection of software, reading and writing of patents, deposit requirements in&#xD;
copyright, and avoiding divulgence of confidential information, i.e.&#xD;
maintaining internal secrecy among the employee.
Page(s): 277-285</summary>
    <dc:date>2001-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

