<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>NOPR Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/31256" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/31256</id>
  <updated>2026-10-12T02:57:59Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-10-12T02:57:59Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Speedy Patent Application Examination at the Indian Patent Office:  Impact of Nitto Denko Corporation Case</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/31294" />
    <author>
      <name>Wilson, Neeti</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/31294</id>
    <updated>2016-07-20T05:21:36Z</updated>
    <published>2015-03-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Speedy Patent Application Examination at the Indian Patent Office:  Impact of Nitto Denko Corporation Case
Authors: Wilson, Neeti
Abstract: The Indian intellectual property scenario is&#xD;
developing at a very fast rate in India and one finds some or the other newspaper&#xD;
headline related to the same. This section is devoted to presenting the current&#xD;
Indian IP news in the limelight to keep the readers abreast of the latest&#xD;
trends. The spotlight for March 2015 is the recent report submitted government&#xD;
appointed committee to examine the feasibility of expedited examination of a&#xD;
patent application and whether such expedited examination was envisaged in the&#xD;
current patent statue. Any comments or suggestions may be sent to &lt;sup&gt;†&lt;/sup&gt;IPneeti@outlook.com&#xD;
or neeti@anandandanand.com.
Page(s): 127-130</summary>
    <dc:date>2015-03-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Restricted Acts of Reproduction and Distribution in EU Copyright Law</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/31293" />
    <author>
      <name>Cook, Trevor</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/31293</id>
    <updated>2016-07-20T05:20:32Z</updated>
    <published>2015-03-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: The Restricted Acts of Reproduction and Distribution in EU Copyright Law
Authors: Cook, Trevor
Abstract: Most, but not all, types of act restricted&#xD;
by copyright or related rights in works or other matter are harmonised at an EU&#xD;
level. Thus, along with the restricted act of communication to and making&#xD;
available to the public, the restricted acts of reproduction, distribution and&#xD;
rental are also expressly harmonised at an EU level. Although such other&#xD;
restricted acts have occasioned considerably less case law in the Court of&#xD;
Justice of the EU than the restricted act of communication and making it&#xD;
available to the public, their case law provides an insight into many live&#xD;
issues of EU copyright law, such as the degree of originality required for&#xD;
copyright to subsist and the scope of the doctrine of exhaustion of rights. In&#xD;
some areas, such as originality, the Court has been prepared to extend the&#xD;
ambit of the EU harmonising legislation into areas which the legislature did&#xD;
not purport to harmonise; but there have been others where it has not been&#xD;
prepared so to do, thereby flagging up lacunae in the harmonisation of&#xD;
copyright at an EU level. One already established such lacuna is that of&#xD;
certain restricted acts as mandated, as to copyright, by the Berne Convention. The&#xD;
Court has recently, in a case which concerns aspects of the restricted acts of&#xD;
both reproduction and distribution, and as to the latter the scope of the&#xD;
doctrine of exhaustion of rights, declined to seize the opportunity offered to&#xD;
it to clarify the status under EU law of another restricted act, that of&#xD;
adaptation, as mandated by Article 12 of the Berne Convention.
Page(s): 122-126</summary>
    <dc:date>2015-03-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Intellectual Property and Transparency in Trade Negotiations:  The Experience of Thailand</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/31292" />
    <author>
      <name>Kuanpoth, Jakkrit</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/31292</id>
    <updated>2016-07-20T05:19:33Z</updated>
    <published>2015-03-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Intellectual Property and Transparency in Trade Negotiations:  The Experience of Thailand
Authors: Kuanpoth, Jakkrit
Abstract: This article concentrates on the problem of&#xD;
non-transparency in non-multilateral norm-setting activities in the&#xD;
intellectual property field. It highlights the experience of Thailand in order&#xD;
to show the inability of the general public to participate in decision-making&#xD;
relating to trade negotiations and to access information regarding trade&#xD;
agreements. It explores the issue of transparency in this international&#xD;
norm-setting process that will support the debate on development-oriented&#xD;
policy in order to better understand the socio-economic impacts of trade&#xD;
liberalization.
Page(s): 112-121</summary>
    <dc:date>2015-03-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Strategies for Technical Assessment via Patent Analysis − A Case Study</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/31291" />
    <author>
      <name>Shrivastava, Shivani</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Verma, H N</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Saha, R</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/31291</id>
    <updated>2016-07-20T05:17:45Z</updated>
    <published>2015-03-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Strategies for Technical Assessment via Patent Analysis − A Case Study
Authors: Shrivastava, Shivani; Verma, H N; Saha, R
Abstract: &lt;span style="mso-ansi-language:&#xD;
EN-IN"&gt;The objective of present study is to understand&#xD;
the current situation in the area of biological control of plant diseases and&#xD;
to gain understanding of where the future technology is moving. The trends and&#xD;
direction of technology is explored through analysis of patents granted by the&#xD;
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) related to biocontrol of&#xD;
plant diseases over the period 1997-2007. It shows an overall increasing trend&#xD;
of patents granted in the area of biocontrol technology used for combating&#xD;
plant diseases. Most of the patents are related to tissue culture techniques,&#xD;
plant breeding and biotechnology. It has also been observed that top most&#xD;
assignees were Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc, Monsanto Technology, Stine&#xD;
Seed Farm, Inc, Cornell Research Foundation Inc, Mertec LLC, etc.&#xD;
&#xD;
&lt;/span&gt;
Page(s): 104-111</summary>
    <dc:date>2015-03-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

