<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>NOPR Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/3128" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/3128</id>
  <updated>2026-10-10T04:34:59Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-10-10T04:34:59Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Analysis of contributions in 'Annals of Library and Information Studies'</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/7497" />
    <author>
      <name>Verma, Neerja</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Tamrakar, Rajnish</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Sharma, Priyanka</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/7497</id>
    <updated>2018-08-03T13:16:25Z</updated>
    <published>2007-06-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Analysis of contributions in 'Annals of Library and Information Studies'
Authors: Verma, Neerja; Tamrakar, Rajnish; Sharma, Priyanka
Abstract: This paper deals with the analysis of the 131 contributions of the journal entitled' Annals of Library &amp; Information Studies'&#xD;
published during 1999-2005. It examines yearwise, institutionswise, statewise distribution of contributions, authorship pattern,&#xD;
citation analysis, length of the contributions etc. The study shows that most of the contributions of this journal are contributed&#xD;
by single author and statewise distribution shows that most of the contributions are contributed from New Delhi. Citation&#xD;
analysis of 1456 citations includes to find out average number of citations per contribution, types of publications cited and&#xD;
preparing of ranked list of cited journals in contributions of this journal. The study reveals that journals are the most cited&#xD;
publication amongst the library and information scientists and the source journal i.e. Annals of Library and Information Studies&#xD;
is the most cited journal in the contributions of this journal
Page(s): 106-111</summary>
    <dc:date>2007-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A bibliometric study of laser literature in India, 1995-2005</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/3251" />
    <author>
      <name>Rajendiran, P.</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Parihar, Y. S.</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/3251</id>
    <updated>2018-08-03T13:16:58Z</updated>
    <published>2007-06-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: A bibliometric study of laser literature in India, 1995-2005
Authors: Rajendiran, P.; Parihar, Y. S.
Abstract: Identifies various bibliometric indicators of articles published by the Indian researchers in the field of laser science and&#xD;
technology during the period 1995-2005. The Scopus - the indexing/abstracting online database is the main source for this&#xD;
study. The bibliometric techniques, such as Bradford's law, Lotka's law and the Subramanyam formula were employed&#xD;
respectively to measure quantitative distribution of literature in sources/journals, author productivity, and the degree of&#xD;
collaboration among authors. The study found that the literature growth has steadily increased and the growth rate over the&#xD;
period of time was 22.436 articles per year. Of the total literature, 97.32 % appeared as research articles. Literature was found&#xD;
to be published in eight different disciplines, and the percentage of multi-disciplinary articles was 18.93. The log-log plot&#xD;
drawn for distribution of literature in various sources/journals fits the typical Bradford S-shaped curve. The study identified 20&#xD;
core sources and 23 core journals. It was found that majority of authors contributed only one article (65.04%), which is larger&#xD;
than the 60% of original Lotka's data. The degree of collaboration among authors is 0.94. The average length of an article is&#xD;
7.09.
Page(s): 112-118</summary>
    <dc:date>2007-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bibliographic coupling in toxicology journals</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/3250" />
    <author>
      <name>Devi, B. Mini</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/3250</id>
    <updated>2018-08-03T13:17:25Z</updated>
    <published>2007-06-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Bibliographic coupling in toxicology journals
Authors: Devi, B. Mini
Abstract: Explores the phenomena of bibliographic coupling in nine core journals in toxicology indexed in the Toxicology Information&#xD;
Online (TOXLINE), the international database. A total of 1218 articles were taken for analysis using Software Package for&#xD;
Social Sciences (SPSS). The journal Toxicology had highest percentage of bibliographically coupled articles i.e. 15.3%. There&#xD;
was no fixed trend in the development of number of bibliographically coupled articles. The number of coupled articles decreased&#xD;
as the coupling strength increased.
Page(s): 103-105</summary>
    <dc:date>2007-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Status of libraries in higher technical education institutions: with special reference to deemed universities of North India</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/3249" />
    <author>
      <name>Vasishta, Seema</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/3249</id>
    <updated>2018-08-03T13:17:51Z</updated>
    <published>2007-06-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Status of libraries in higher technical education institutions: with special reference to deemed universities of North India
Authors: Vasishta, Seema
Abstract: Examines the present conditions in libraries in technical deemed universities of north India. The study is based on the&#xD;
analysis of physical facilities (building, open access and working hours), budget, professional staff, organisational structure,&#xD;
library holdings (print as well as non-print), users, technical processing, etc. Questionnaire method was used to collect the&#xD;
data. Comparative data in tabular form of six technical deemed universities are drawn for showing the strengths and weaknesses&#xD;
of these libraries. Based on the results of the survey, few suggestions have been given. These suggestions will be useful for&#xD;
planning and policy making of libraries in technical deemed universities.
Page(s): 95-102</summary>
    <dc:date>2007-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

