<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>NOPR Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/31900" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/31900</id>
  <updated>2026-10-11T07:01:52Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-10-11T07:01:52Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Enforcement Directive and Harmonisation of Remedies for  Intellectual Property Infringement in the EU</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/31958" />
    <author>
      <name>Cook, Trevor</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/31958</id>
    <updated>2016-07-20T05:17:44Z</updated>
    <published>2015-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Enforcement Directive and Harmonisation of Remedies for  Intellectual Property Infringement in the EU
Authors: Cook, Trevor
Abstract: &lt;span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&#xD;
" times="" new="" roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"times="" roman";mso-bidi-font-family:="" mangal;mso-ansi-language:en-gb;mso-fareast-language:en-us;mso-bidi-language:="" hi"="" lang="EN-GB"&gt;Directive 2004/48/EC on the enforcement of intellectual property rights&#xD;
harmonises various aspects of civil court procedure and remedies as applied to&#xD;
most types of intellectual property in the European Union. Despite having now&#xD;
been in effect for over 10 years, it has until recently featured remarkably&#xD;
little in EU intellectual property litigation and there have been very few&#xD;
references to the Court of Justice that have exclusively concerned it.Thus&#xD;
there has been no opportunity to cast light on what is meant by the rather&#xD;
vague language in which it is expressed. This situation is now starting to&#xD;
change, and the various controversies the subject of the current references to&#xD;
the Court of Justice under it are reviewed in this article. The results of this&#xD;
process of interpretation will not only affect all national courts hearing&#xD;
intellectual property cases throughout the EU; they will also bind the new&#xD;
Unified Patents Court when that comes into force, despite the fact that in some&#xD;
cases the corresponding wording of the underlying Agreement which establishes&#xD;
the new Unified Patents Court, and which wording is based on the Enforcement&#xD;
Directive, deviates from it.&lt;/span&gt;
Page(s): 264-269</summary>
    <dc:date>2015-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Portfolio Analysis of Hair/Scalp Cosmeceuticals</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/31957" />
    <author>
      <name>Pawar, Mahesh</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/31957</id>
    <updated>2016-07-20T05:16:30Z</updated>
    <published>2015-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Patent Portfolio Analysis of Hair/Scalp Cosmeceuticals
Authors: Pawar, Mahesh
Abstract: &lt;span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&#xD;
" times="" new="" roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"times="" roman";mso-bidi-font-family:="" mangal;mso-ansi-language:en-gb;mso-fareast-language:en-us;mso-bidi-language:="" hi"="" lang="EN-GB"&gt;The paper identifies the patenting trend of calp health actives in a&#xD;
leave-on product. A landscape of innovation portfolios generated through R&amp;D in scalp care and hair care segment has been investigated covering six&#xD;
years period i.e. from 2008 to 2013. Patents have been classified based on benefit&#xD;
from active ingredient, number of benefits from active ingredient, nature of&#xD;
active ingredient, assignee, priority year, country of origin and&#xD;
container/applicator system. The patenting trend indicates that more research&#xD;
is going on products with natural extracts because of consumer preference over&#xD;
synthetic chemicals for the scalp treatment. Analysis of the data revealed that&#xD;
Henkel,&lt;span style="mso-bidi-font-weight:bold"&gt; L'Oreal, Amorepacific&#xD;
Corporation, Unilever and Procter &amp; Gamble are the leaders in&#xD;
patenting. Geographical mapping shows extensive patent application by South&#xD;
Korea as priority country followed by USA, Japan, China, and Germany. Maximum&#xD;
number of patents claimed for antidandruff benefit from the active.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
Page(s): 250-263</summary>
    <dc:date>2015-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Transplantation of Foreign Law into Indonesian Copyright Law: The Victory of Capitalism Ideology on Pancasila Ideology</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/31956" />
    <author>
      <name>Saidin, O K</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/31956</id>
    <updated>2016-07-20T05:14:51Z</updated>
    <published>2015-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Transplantation of Foreign Law into Indonesian Copyright Law: The Victory of Capitalism Ideology on Pancasila Ideology
Authors: Saidin, O K
Abstract:   The Journey of Indonesian history has 350 years experience under the imperialism of&#xD;
Netherland and Japan until the era of post-independence which was still under&#xD;
the shadow of the developed countries. The Indonesia became more and more&#xD;
dependable on the foreign countries which brought influence to its political&#xD;
choice in regulating the Copyright Law in the following days. Indonesian&#xD;
copyright protection model which economic goal firstly based on the country’s&#xD;
Pancasila philosophy, evidently must subject to the will of the era that move&#xD;
towards liberal-capitalist. This era is no longer taking side to Indonesian&#xD;
independence goal to realize law and economic development based on Pancasila,&#xD;
especially the first, fourth, and fifth &lt;i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal"&gt;sila&lt;/i&gt;&#xD;
(Principle). The goal of law and economic development in Indonesia, regulated&#xD;
under the paradigm of democratic economy is to realize prosperous and equitable&#xD;
society based on Indonesian religious culture principle that can no longer be&#xD;
realized. &#xD;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;span style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;font-family:&#xD;
" times="" new="" roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"times="" roman";letter-spacing:="" -.1pt;mso-ansi-language:en-gb;mso-fareast-language:en-us;mso-bidi-language:="" ar-sa"="" lang="EN-GB"&gt;  Pancasila as the basis in forming legal norms in Indonesia functioned as&#xD;
the &lt;i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal"&gt;grundnorm&lt;/i&gt; which means that all&#xD;
the legal norms must be convenient and not to contradict the principles of the&#xD;
basic state philosophy of Pancasila. But the battle of foreign ideology in&#xD;
legal political choice through transplantation policy, did not manage to give&#xD;
the victory to Pancasila as the country’s ideology, but to give the victory to&#xD;
the foreign capitalistic ideology instead. It resulted with the non-enforcement&#xD;
of Copyright Law. Borrowing the term used by Van Vollenhoven – the rejection on&#xD;
Indonesian Copyright Law was not because of the weak legal sanction, but due to&#xD;
the failure in the law enforcement, because the legal substance regulated in&#xD;
copyright laws that ever enacted in Indonesia, have never been part of their&#xD;
law; never been part of the nation’s soul, or have never been the law of&#xD;
Indonesian society, but it is a law that was transplanted, and forced to be&#xD;
enforced in Indonesia. One law that is originated from capitalistic ideology,&#xD;
not originated from Pancasila ideology. This is the end of the ideological&#xD;
battle in choosing the formulation policy of Indonesian Copyright Law. It can&#xD;
also be said that it is the Victory of Capitalistic Ideology on Pancasila&#xD;
Ideology as the end of Pancasila Ideology.&lt;/span&gt;
Page(s): 230-249</summary>
    <dc:date>2015-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Characterizing Pharmaceuticals on Data Exclusivity in Malaysia</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/31955" />
    <author>
      <name>Fatokun, Omotayo</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Hassali, Mohamed Azmi A</name>
    </author>
    <author>
      <name>Ibrahim, Mohamed Izham M</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/31955</id>
    <updated>2016-07-20T05:11:53Z</updated>
    <published>2015-07-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Title: Characterizing Pharmaceuticals on Data Exclusivity in Malaysia
Authors: Fatokun, Omotayo; Hassali, Mohamed Azmi A; Ibrahim, Mohamed Izham M
Abstract: &lt;span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&#xD;
" times="" new="" roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"times="" roman";mso-bidi-font-family:="" mangal;mso-ansi-language:en-gb;mso-fareast-language:en-us;mso-bidi-language:="" hi"="" lang="EN-GB"&gt;This study analyses the occurrence and characteristics of pharmaceutical&#xD;
products containing new chemical entities granted data exclusivity in Malaysia&#xD;
since the implementation of the provision in 2011. Data for the drug products&#xD;
granted data exclusivity in Malaysia during March 2011 and April 2014 was obtained&#xD;
from the Malaysian National Pharmaceutical Control Bureau Register for granted&#xD;
data exclusivity. For each product, data on the type of product, the&#xD;
therapeutic class and the patent status in the reference country/jurisdiction&#xD;
and Malaysia was collected. The patent status of the drug products were sourced&#xD;
from international and Malaysian Patent Databases. A total of ten drug products&#xD;
containing new chemical entities (NCEs) were granted data exclusivity during&#xD;
the data period, with an average of 3.3 NCEs per year. The products were&#xD;
distributed among five therapeutic classes, with 50% of the products belonging&#xD;
to antineoplastic agents. Average effective data exclusivity period for the&#xD;
study sample was about 3 ½ years. Nearly all (90%) products had at least one&#xD;
granted patent or patent application covering the active ingredient of the new&#xD;
chemical entities. Both the granted patent period and data exclusivity period&#xD;
run concurrently, with the former extending beyond the latter by an average of&#xD;
8 years. In this study, data exclusivity was generally associated with high&#xD;
selling drugs. Data exclusivity was mainly used as an additional intellectual&#xD;
property, with the patent period longer than the data exclusivity period.&lt;/span&gt;
Page(s): 223-229</summary>
    <dc:date>2015-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

