<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>NOPR Collection:</title>
    <link>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/14074</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 12:09:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-10-11T12:09:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Colour Markability: Registrable in Few Nations, but Debatable among Many!</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/14082</link>
      <description>Title: Colour Markability: Registrable in Few Nations, but Debatable among Many!
Authors: Yang, Deli
Abstract: Colour marks have&#xD;
been equally debatable before and after they became registrable in few&#xD;
countries. Before some landmark cases set the broad legal framework for colour&#xD;
mark protection, debates centred on the registrability. Nowadays,&#xD;
registrability remains an issue, but heightened debates have been surrounding&#xD;
the conditions and interpretations of this &#xD;
non-traditional mark. With the increasing importance of marks for businesses&#xD;
and organizations, colour mark issues have become internationally&#xD;
controversial. This Global IP debate thus, opens with two landmark cases: &lt;i style=""&gt;Qualitex &lt;/i&gt;v&lt;i style=""&gt; Jacobson&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i style=""&gt;BP &lt;/i&gt;v&lt;i style=""&gt; Woolworths&lt;/i&gt;. It then focuses on some&#xD;
conceptual issues relevant to the colour mark itself, its origin with relevant&#xD;
exemplar cases and historical evolvement, to enrich the legal framework and&#xD;
accumulate case experience to resolve colour mark disputes. Next, this column&#xD;
discusses the debates for or against colour mark registrations by drawing&#xD;
arguments and reasoning from scholars and practitioners. The debate ends with&#xD;
some reflections and a possible solution.
Page(s): 246-250</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/14082</guid>
      <dc:date>2012-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Exceptions and Limitations in European Union Copyright Law</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/14081</link>
      <description>Title: Exceptions and Limitations in European Union Copyright Law
Authors: Cook, Trevor
Abstract: Most countries, including all those in the&#xD;
EU, provide for exceptions and limitations to copyright by exhaustively listing&#xD;
and defining in their copyright laws all such permitted exceptions and&#xD;
limitations. The United&#xD;
  States has been an exception in this&#xD;
respect, having instead a so called ‘fair use’ approach which provides four&#xD;
parameters for its courts to apply. Some EU Member States, unhappy at the&#xD;
inflexibility of their respective approaches to this issue are now starting to&#xD;
explore to what extent they can move towards a ‘fair use’ approach. This&#xD;
article considers why this issue has become a particular problem in the EU,&#xD;
what sort of scope EU Member States have to amend their national laws in such&#xD;
circumstances, and where further flexibilities might develop in the case law as&#xD;
a result of the courts applying principles from outside copyright law, notably&#xD;
on the basis of fundamental human rights.
Page(s): 243-245</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/14081</guid>
      <dc:date>2012-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>‘Copyright World’ and Access to Information: Conjoined &lt;i style=""&gt;via&lt;/i&gt; the Internet</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/14080</link>
      <description>Title: ‘Copyright World’ and Access to Information: Conjoined &lt;i style=""&gt;via&lt;/i&gt; the Internet
Authors: Sebastian, Tania
Abstract: Access to information, despite&#xD;
wide intellectual acceptance, is&#xD;
still a struggle for many in various quarters of the world. In today’s era&#xD;
there exist constraints in the way information is shared; dividing continents&#xD;
based on the way information is accessible to its people. This paper strives to&#xD;
understand the underpinning of the accessibility to information in the human&#xD;
right perspective, with a special&#xD;
mention of the current debate on accessibility of the Internet on the lines of&#xD;
concepts which constitute emerging access&#xD;
to knowledge coalition. The arguments of the present paper take the&#xD;
following form: It begins with an introduction to the oft-debated access to&#xD;
information question; goes on to elucidate the view of various scholars on why&#xD;
information needs to be free and extends the aspect of freedom of information&#xD;
to the human right paradigm; then expounds the activism of ‘access to knowledge’&#xD;
advocates for access to information; and finally talks about European Union’s&#xD;
legalization of access to information on the Internet as a ‘fundamental right’&#xD;
before conclusion.
Page(s): 235-242</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/14080</guid>
      <dc:date>2012-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Protecting Geographical Indications in Malawi: Current Situation and Future Prospects</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/14079</link>
      <description>Title: Protecting Geographical Indications in Malawi: Current Situation and Future Prospects
Authors: Uluko, Hankie; Oyewunmi, Adejoke; Mandewo, George
Abstract: &lt;br&gt;This paper&#xD;
examines the challenges and opportunities available for the protection of&#xD;
geographical indications (GIs) in Malawi. Like in many countries in&#xD;
Africa, there are no statutory provisions for the protection of GIs in Malawi. The&#xD;
challenges and opportunities available for GI protection in Malawi were&#xD;
determined using the SWOT analysis which included data from consumer preference&#xD;
survey, key informants, interviews and desk study.&lt;/br&gt;&#xD;
&lt;br&gt;The analysis showed that Malawian consumers&#xD;
are not only influenced by price but also the place of origin of a product&#xD;
(geographical indication) and the quality associated with it. It also showed&#xD;
that Malawi&#xD;
has limited human capacity, infrastructure and finances to successfully&#xD;
implement a &lt;i style=""&gt;sui generis&lt;/i&gt; system of&#xD;
protection despite having many potential GIs to benefit from. A comparative&#xD;
analysis found that the available regime of protection is inadequate in&#xD;
protecting GIs. The study concluded that Malawi stands to benefit from GI&#xD;
protection of its products which already have local, regional and international&#xD;
reputation. This would be achieved by short term revisions of the trademark&#xD;
laws and in the long run through a &lt;i style=""&gt;sui&#xD;
generis&lt;/i&gt; system of protection.&lt;/br&gt;
Page(s): 226-234</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/14079</guid>
      <dc:date>2012-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

