<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>NOPR Collection:</title>
    <link>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/61834</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 19:37:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-10-09T19:37:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>A study of ‘calf-path’ in file naming in institutional repositories in India</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/61839</link>
      <description>Title: A study of ‘calf-path’ in file naming in institutional repositories in India
Authors: Jabeen, Husna; Harinarayana, N. S.
Abstract: This study examined the file naming practices in 39 institutional repositories. There is evidence that calf-path exists in&#xD;
file naming among the curators of institutional repositories in India. The study showed that no standard or logic seems to&#xD;
have been followed by repositories in the naming of the files, except by the National Digital Library of India (NDLI) and the&#xD;
CSIR-National Institute of Science Communication and Policy Research (CSIR-NIScPR). The study also examined the&#xD;
composition of the filenames, which shows that the author names (11.2%), titles (11.9%), journal title with volume and issue&#xD;
numbers (21.1%) form the basis for the formation of filenames. It is suggested that digital repository managers have to give&#xD;
more attention to name files in the institutional repository in the interest of uniformity and consistency.
Page(s): 1-9</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/61839</guid>
      <dc:date>2023-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The scope of open peer review in the scholarly publishing ecosystem</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/61838</link>
      <description>Title: The scope of open peer review in the scholarly publishing ecosystem
Authors: Majumdar, Sandip
Abstract: This study explores the selective corpus of existing literature on Open Peer Review (OPR) to understand and map the&#xD;
extent of adoption of OPR in the scholarly communication, the reflection of different aspects of human emotion embedded&#xD;
in the open peer review reports and authors’ response as well, the influence of OPR reports on citation status of articles, and&#xD;
application of Blockchain, Artificial Intelligence and similar technologies in improving the operational viability as well as&#xD;
acceptability of OPR among the scholarly community. The study finds the emergence of various OPR adoption policies and&#xD;
levels of adoption together with emerging models of scientific publishing. Clearly, there is a lack of uniform OPR adoption&#xD;
policy. It also highlights the association of different sets of human emotional traits with OPR reports. The experimentation&#xD;
with the possibility of treating preprint servers and open access repositories as a manuscript marketplace for the eventual&#xD;
selection of articles for open peer review and journal publication is noticed. More research on the influence of human&#xD;
behavioural aspects on OPR practice and the application of emergent technologies in OPR would be required before finally&#xD;
settling down on a stable roadmap for OPR.
Page(s): 10-21</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/61838</guid>
      <dc:date>2023-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Collaborative authorship patterns in computer science publications</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/61837</link>
      <description>Title: Collaborative authorship patterns in computer science publications
Authors: Kumari, Priti; Kumar, Rajeev
Abstract: Based on the analysis of data we observe that the share of single-authored papers was significantly high in theoretical&#xD;
computer science, while collaborative efforts dominate computer science system research like PL, AI, ML, etc.&#xD;
Collaborative authorship is higher in journals over conferences. Further, values of collaborative indicators are also high for&#xD;
journals except for the Machine Learning (ML) subfield. In addition, the author distribution patterns are different for&#xD;
conferences and journals. The findings also exhibited diversity in authorship trends across sub-fields of CS research. Our&#xD;
results show collaboration trends in conferences and journals of major CS subfields. Such collaborative patterns benefit the&#xD;
funding agency, policymakers, scientific community, and researchers to plan and execute their research.
Page(s): 22-32</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/61837</guid>
      <dc:date>2023-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Automatic extraction of significant terms from the title and abstract of scientific papers using the machine learning algorithm: A multiple module approach</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/61836</link>
      <description>Title: Automatic extraction of significant terms from the title and abstract of scientific papers using the machine learning algorithm: A multiple module approach
Authors: Mukherjee, Bhaskar; Majhi, Debasis
Abstract: Keyword extraction is the task of identifying important terms or phrase that are most representative of the source&#xD;
document. Although the process of automatic extraction of keywords from title is an old method, it was mainly for&#xD;
extraction from a single web document. Our approach differs from previous research works on keyword extraction in several&#xD;
aspects. For those who are non-expert of the scientific fields, understating scientific research trends is difficult. The purpose&#xD;
of this study is to develop an automatic method of obtaining overviews of a scientific field for non-experts by capturing&#xD;
research trends. This empirical study excavates significant term extraction using Natural Language Processing (NLP) tools.&#xD;
More than 15000 titles saved in a .csv file was our dataset and scripts written in Python were our process to compare how far&#xD;
significant terms of scientific title corpus are similar or different to the terms available in the abstract of that same scientific&#xD;
article corpus. A light-weight unsupervised title extractor, Yet Another Keyword Extractor (YAKE) was used to extract the&#xD;
results. Based on our analysis, it can be concluded that these algorithms can be used for other fields too by the non-experts&#xD;
of that subject field to perform automatic extraction of significant words and understanding trends. Our algorithm could be a&#xD;
solution to reduce the labour-intensive manual indexing process.
Page(s): 33-40</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/61836</guid>
      <dc:date>2023-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

