<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>NOPR Collection:</title>
    <link>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/62125</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 02:12:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-10-10T02:12:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Industrial Designs and Folklore:  A Comparative Study in Indian perspective</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/62144</link>
      <description>Title: Industrial Designs and Folklore:  A Comparative Study in Indian perspective
Authors: Swarup, Sameer Kumar; Rastogi, Sachin
Abstract: The Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCEs), Folklore, as part of a nation's cultural legacy, is seen as a vital component of &#xD;
its identity. Traditional Cultural Expressions, the Folklore, may be described as knowledge that has been produced over the &#xD;
time, perpetuated, and passed down from generation to generation within a community, and which has become a part of that &#xD;
group's identity. Both emerging and developed nations recognise the value of TCEs and Folklores. However, the rights of those &#xD;
who preserve these cultural expressions/ folklores are not adequately safeguarded. The present paper compares the protection of&#xD;
Folklore in India to those of other major countries. With reference to folklore, the paper also analyses probable IPR overlaps in &#xD;
the context of industrial designs, copyrights, trademarks and other IPRs. The strategies and means of protecting folklore in the &#xD;
present IPR regime in India and other major countries are also discussed in this paper.
Page(s): 273-283</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/62144</guid>
      <dc:date>2023-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Crossroad between Intellectual Property and Clinical Trials: Balancing  Incentives for Innovation with Access to Healthcare</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/62142</link>
      <description>Title: The Crossroad between Intellectual Property and Clinical Trials: Balancing  Incentives for Innovation with Access to Healthcare
Authors: Nidhi, Aditi
Abstract: Intellectual property (IP) is essential for encouraging innovation in the pharmaceutical business, particularly in clinical &#xD;
trials. However, IP can also limit access to healthcare by making drugs and treatments unaffordable for certain populations. &#xD;
The pharmaceutical industry relies heavily on intellectual property protections to incentivize innovation and support the &#xD;
development of new drugs. Moreover, clinical trials play an indispensable part in the medication development process, &#xD;
providing the evidence needed to support regulatory approval and marketing. The intersection of intellectual property and &#xD;
clinical trials raises important legal and ethical issues that need to be carefully considered. This article analyses the &#xD;
significance of intellectual property in the process of drug innovation, its impact on clinical trials, and the ways in which &#xD;
intellectual property might affect the accessibility and price of new treatments. This paper also explores the balance between &#xD;
incentivizing innovation through IP and ensuring access to healthcare, notably within the setting of clinical trials. &#xD;
It examines the history of intellectual property laws in the pharmaceutical industry, how patents and exclusivity &#xD;
encourage innovation, and how these incentives affect healthcare access. The paper also discusses alternative models for &#xD;
incentivizing innovation, such as open-source drug development and prize-based systems. The article concludes that while &#xD;
intellectual property is vital to encourage innovation in the pharmaceutical business, it must be balanced with efforts to &#xD;
assure universal access to healthcare. We argue that policymakers and industry stakeholders must work together to develop &#xD;
policies and practices that promote innovation while ensuring that new drugs are accessible and affordable to all.
Page(s): 284-292</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/62142</guid>
      <dc:date>2023-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Paradigm Shift in Indian and International Patent Regime- Critical Review on  Ex- and Current Scenario (Covid-19 Impact)</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/62141</link>
      <description>Title: A Paradigm Shift in Indian and International Patent Regime- Critical Review on  Ex- and Current Scenario (Covid-19 Impact)
Authors: Sahitya, Kadiyala Venkata; Kumar, K I Pavan
Abstract: The innovation markers are namely patents which give the creation the identity, novelty and utilization in industry or for &#xD;
commercial use in public. There were many patents filed under different judicatory laws of different countries which give &#xD;
the sole right and responsibility to own the invention till the expiry of patent by the owner (Patentee). The rules and &#xD;
regulations also enable the patentee to take necessary action against the misuse or prior use and also copying of invention. &#xD;
There are circumstances like national emergency like the Covid -19 pandemic which could create the urgency to make &#xD;
public access for the medicines under the clinical trial or the generic form before the expiry of the patent in order to increase &#xD;
the health care needs. The national emergency globally has awaken to recreate or amend few judiciary laws of different &#xD;
countries like waiver of patents, compulsory licenses and also paying a remuneration amount to the patentee. The countries &#xD;
like U.S, India, China, Japan have played a key role in managing the pandemic by encouraging generic medicine &#xD;
manufacturing and licensing. The COVID-19 crisis affects not only Patent Law. However, COVID-19 clearly presents an &#xD;
imminent threat to public health which, in most jurisdictions, is likely to justify the grant of compulsory licenses and more&#xD;
changes in the few penal codes and articles under specific provisions made by the government. There was also huge impact &#xD;
on the patent filings by different countries which enumerated the increase of 16 % by China and also a significant &#xD;
contribution by the countries like U.S, India, Europe, Japan, Italy, etc. The Data exclusivity was reported including the &#xD;
women investors share which is considerably high. The pandemic has shaped new reforms in digitalization aspects and kept &#xD;
open many avenues in the medical and technology sectors in the years to come.
Page(s): 293-303</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/62141</guid>
      <dc:date>2023-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Status of Geographical Indications in the Northeast Region of India</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/62140</link>
      <description>Title: Status of Geographical Indications in the Northeast Region of India
Authors: Pangging, G; Sharma, M; Sharma, C L; Rai, N; Gogoi, J
Abstract: Geographical Indications (GI) is considered as a tool for providing legal protection to goods originated or manufactured &#xD;
from particular geographical location during trade. Till now, Northeast region of India had 35 goods registered under GI which &#xD;
accounted only 7.9% of total number of goods registered under GI in India. The GI registration in Northeast region of India has&#xD;
been started since 2007 and the highest number of registrations was found in 2014 (35.48 %) and lowest in 2007, 2016, 2017 &#xD;
and 2018 (3.23 %). Assam had the highest number of GI goods i.e., 10 goods that accounted for 28 %, followed by Mizoram &#xD;
(20 %), Manipur (20 %), Nagaland (11 %) and the other states (21 %). Most of the GI registrations were done for Class 25 &#xD;
(clothing-traditional attire) that accounted for 38.71%, followed by Class 31 (32.26 %), Class 30 (29.03 %) etc. However, only &#xD;
25.7 % of goods registered in Part B of GI were Assam (orthodox), Bokachaul, Chak Hao, Idu Mishmi textile, Joha rice, Muga&#xD;
silk, Mizo chilli, Naga Mirchi and Sikkim large cardamom. This region has high potential to register many goods under GI &#xD;
because of high cultural diversity, diverse ethnicity, rich biodiversity and indigenous knowledge system.
Page(s): 304-311</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/62140</guid>
      <dc:date>2023-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

