<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>NOPR Collection:</title>
    <link>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/67300</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 23:24:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-10-09T23:24:43Z</dc:date>
    
    <item>
      <title>The Interplay between Intellectual Property Rights, Reproductive Rights and ADR  as a Dispute Settlement Window</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/67315</link>
      <description>Title: The Interplay between Intellectual Property Rights, Reproductive Rights and ADR  as a Dispute Settlement Window
Authors: Das, Sushmita; Gomasta, Shubhang
Abstract: The intersection between Intellectual Property Rights (herein as I.P.R), Alternative Dispute Resolution (herein as &#xD;
A.D.R) and Reproductive rights and technologies (herein as R.R.T.) play a very essential role in the contemporary law and &#xD;
society. The authors emphasise the significance of three distinct domains together to understand their relevance which &#xD;
enhanced their own importance when merged together. As there is no much of available jurisprudence of this subject matter &#xD;
but when the authors explored it convergence in current context it found much of its relevance as the I.P.R is a very broad &#xD;
area where geographic rights, brainly rights are given for the protection when connected to the reproductive rights like &#xD;
abortion, surrogacy and various technological advancements such as in-vitro fertilization (I.V.F.) to treat the infertility as &#xD;
there are many herbal treatments available which isn’t geographically indicated yet neither patented. The authors asserts that &#xD;
the technological advancement for treating the infertility should be protected by copyrighted, a consideration frequently &#xD;
overlooked following the collapse of commercial surrogacy due to the enactment of new legislation forbids it. These &#xD;
technological advancements, drugs, herbal medicines for fertility treatments will be a need of an hour and to address such &#xD;
issue and there must be single window dispute resolutions for the Indian citizens either in the form of courts or through &#xD;
alternative means of dispute resolution mechanism. However, the authors examine how arbitration can function as an &#xD;
impartial forum for resolving disputes in this unique domain, while reconciling the private interests of innovators with the &#xD;
essential human rights related to reproductive autonomy and access.
Page(s): 161-168</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/67315</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-02-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Artificial Creations, Real Rights: Examining Copyrightability of   Generative AI Data</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/67314</link>
      <description>Title: Artificial Creations, Real Rights: Examining Copyrightability of   Generative AI Data
Authors: Setia, Sunidhi; Vasan, Madhumitha
Abstract: Since the launch of ChatGPT by OpenAI, the investment in generative AI has quintupled. While individuals employing &#xD;
these tools are creating novel work every day, the parent companies are generating billions of revenues. With increasing &#xD;
number of high-profile lawsuits relating to Generative AI and Copyright around the world, the paper discusses the concept &#xD;
of copyrightability in the new era of technological advancements. Generative AI undergoes massive training using data to &#xD;
understand images, sounds and visuals. They then respond when prompted by a user.  &#xD;
Through this paper the authors discussed the basic concepts of ownership and then examine different scenarios to &#xD;
determine authorship over works generated by AI. Building on established concept like the essential need of human &#xD;
authorship and creativity element to grant copyright to the works of AI, the paper explores and divulge into new doctrines &#xD;
like the “Significant Input Test”. The authors argue that while copying large amount of copyrighted content off the internet &#xD;
and generating new content makes out a case for copyright infringement, the generative AI algorithm is premised on &#xD;
“transformative use” which in turn constitutes fair use. The authors did a comparative study of judicia-legal development &#xD;
around the concept of copyrightability of the content produced by Generative AI focusing on jurisdictions like US and EU, &#xD;
suggesting a way forward for Indian legislature.
Page(s): 169-180</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/67314</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-02-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Appraisal of Misappropriation of Traditional Cultural Expressions: A SMART   Model Approach</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/67313</link>
      <description>Title: Appraisal of Misappropriation of Traditional Cultural Expressions: A SMART   Model Approach
Authors: Anand, Shubham; Mehrotra, Nidhi
Abstract: The development of humankind has its roots in the tacit knowledge that has shaped their life and well-being. This &#xD;
knowledge, especially in a traditional community, encompasses medicinal knowledge, agricultural and forestry, stories, arts &#xD;
and crafts, music, and dance forms. However, with the advent of globalisation, consumerism and technological &#xD;
advancement, these age-old contents have faced a grave concern of misappropriation, warranting an urgent intervention &#xD;
through holistic and comprehensive means. A lack of uniformity in legal measures and weaker forms of protection, such as &#xD;
existing Intellectual Property Rights, has resulted in cross-border misappropriation. The present study analyses a series of &#xD;
misappropriations to understand the different measures adopted. The study strongly suggests that the convergence of &#xD;
mechanisms across jurisdictions should be aligned with the principles established by international institutions such as &#xD;
UNESCO and WIPO. Moreover, the study proposes a SMART model while advocating a minimum order of uniformity in &#xD;
protecting Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCEs), especially in cases of misuse and misappropriation. The proposed &#xD;
model may be utilized to advance an effective TCEs protection system.
Page(s): 181-195</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/67313</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-02-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rethinking Trademark Rights in Circular Economy from Fashion Upcycling  Perspective</title>
      <link>http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/67312</link>
      <description>Title: Rethinking Trademark Rights in Circular Economy from Fashion Upcycling  Perspective
Authors: Jamal, Nurul Elliyana Abdul; Zainol, Zinatul Ashiqin; Hussein, Safinaz Mohd.; Rusli, Rose Dahlina
Abstract: The fashion industry plays a significant role in the global economy but significantly harms the environment by overusing &#xD;
and polluting natural resources. Like many others, Malaysia's fashion sector operates on a linear economic model that &#xD;
generates substantial waste and contributes to environmental degradation. This study explores the intersection of sustainable &#xD;
fashion and trademark rights in implementing circular economy principles in fashion industry. The purpose of this research &#xD;
is to critically examine the legal tension between brand protection and sustainable practices, identifying the extent to which &#xD;
legal frameworks support or hinder circular initiatives. A qualitative legal research method was employed, involving &#xD;
doctrinal analysis of relevant laws, policies, and case studies. Findings highlight successful sustainable practices in fashion &#xD;
industry, such as textile recycling, second-hand markets, and take-back programs in Malaysia, which align with circular &#xD;
economy principles. It also reveal that while trademark law plays a crucial role in safeguarding brand identity, it can &#xD;
unintentionally obstruct upcycling of branded goods, which are key components of circular fashion. The study concludes &#xD;
that amendment to Trademark Act 2019 and legal reforms approaches are necessary to align trademark protection with the &#xD;
goals of sustainability, encouraging a more balanced legal environment that supports both brand integrity and environmental &#xD;
responsibility. By overcoming these obstacles, Malaysia can strengthen its leadership in sustainable fashion and create a &#xD;
model for integrating circular economy practices into other sectors.
Page(s): 196-206</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/67312</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-02-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

