Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/11193Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Prakash, O | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Umapathy, S | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Shanmugaraju, A | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kalaivani, P Pappa | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Ebenezer, E | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-03-14T06:13:30Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2011-03-14T06:13:30Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2011-02 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0975-105X (Online); 0367-8393 (Print) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/11193 | - |
| dc.description | 11-20 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | A detailed investigation on type II radio bursts pairs in the meter and deca-hectometer wavelength ranges (herein after m-and DH-type II bursts) and their associated flares and CMEs observed during the period 2000-2005 has been presented. Out of 38 events, only 27 events have been selected, which are the CMEs following the associated flares (AF-CMEs). The selected events are divided into two classes using the drift plots: class I, where DH-type II bursts are not continuation of m-type II bursts; and class II, where DH-type II bursts are extensions of m-type II bursts. The study consists of: i) properties of the m- and DH-type II bursts for class I and class II; and ii) characteristics of type II bursts and their associated flares and CMEs. It has been found that there are significant differences in class I and class II type II bursts pairs and they are associated with flares and CMEs (duration, ending frequency, m-type II speed). The class I m-type II bursts have speeds much slower than the class II events. The correlation between the starting frequencies and flare start-CME onset delay times of m- and DH-type II bursts has been found. Out of 27 type II bursts pairs, 26% are associated with class I events, i.e. the DH-type II is not continuous of m-type II burst, which is consistent with two types of coronal shocks model. The remaining 74% of class II events (DH-type II bursts is extension of m-type II bursts) are associated with single shocks model. From these results, it is concluded that the class I type II bursts pairs (m- and DH-type II bursts) tend to be related with flares and CMEs and class II events tend to be related with CMEs. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | NISCAIR-CSIR, India | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | 96.60.ph; 96.60.qe | en_US |
| dc.rights | CC Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 India | en_US |
| dc.source | IJRSP Vol.40(1) [February 2011] | en_US |
| dc.subject | Coronal mass ejection | en_US |
| dc.subject | Solar flare | en_US |
| dc.subject | Solar radio burst | en_US |
| dc.subject | Radio burst type II | en_US |
| dc.title | Characteristics of type II solar radio bursts in the meter and deca-hectometer wavelengths | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | IJRSP Vol.40(1) [February 2011] | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJRSP 40(1) 11-20.pdf | 188.47 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.