Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDegirmenci, Nurhayat-
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Arin-
dc.identifier.issn0975-1017 (Online); 0971-4588 (Print)-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the possibility of using granulated pumice as an alternative to fine aggregate in production of lightweight cement mortar. The cement/pumice fine aggregate ratio is 1:3 for pumice aggregate mortar. The water content is determined by flow table test. Compressive and flexural strength, freeze-thaw resistance, sulfate resistance, water absorption and dry unit weight of the mortars are determined. Mortar using 100% pumice as fine aggregate developed strength in excess 12 MPa and had an oven dry density of 1140-1146 kg/m3 would satisfy the requirements for lightweight mortar and it can be used as in cast in place walls, load bearing and non-load bearing structures. Pumice aggregate mortar is about 50% lighter than Portland cement control mortar due to the replacement of comparatively heavier standard sand by lighter pumice aggregate. The pumice aggregate mortar exhibits a higher frost resistance due to the existence of voids in pumice aggregate. Pumice aggregate mortar showed better performance showing higher residual strength at high temperatures compared Portland cement mortar. The residual compressive strength reduction of pumice aggregate mortar is higher than that of Portland cement mortar exposed to freeze-thaw cycles. The use of pumice aggregate as sand provides the resistance to sulfate attack.en_US
dc.publisherNISCAIR-CSIR, Indiaen_US
dc.rights CC Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Indiaen_US
dc.sourceIJEMS Vol.18(1) [February 2011]en_US
dc.subjectMechanical propertiesen_US
dc.subjectHigh temperaturesen_US
dc.subjectSulfate resistanceen_US
dc.titleUse of pumice fine aggregate as an alternative to standard sand in production of lightweight cement mortaren_US
Appears in Collections:IJEMS Vol.18(1) [February 2011]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
IJEMS 18(1) 61-68.pdf165.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.