Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/13483
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMahbuba, Dilruba-
dc.contributor.authorRousseau, Ronald-
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-01T08:26:59Z-
dc.date.available2012-02-01T08:26:59Z-
dc.date.issued2011-12-
dc.identifier.issn0975-2404 (Online); 0972-5423 (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/13483-
dc.description335-345en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this article a review of Merton’s article about the Matthew effect is presented. The authors discuss what they think Merton really meant and link it to the use of concept symbols and defaults. The Matthew effect is linked to the notions of concept symbols and defaults. The diffusion of Merton’s ideas in science over time is discussed. Several h- and R-indices related to “Matthew” publications are derived. Related effects, namely the Podunk effect, the Knudop effect and the Wehttam effect are briefly discussed. Also the Matilda effect is given some attention as is the under representation of women in science and factors explaining this phenomenon.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNISCAIR-CSIR, Indiaen_US
dc.rights CC Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Indiaen_US
dc.sourceALIS Vol.58(4) [December 2011]en_US
dc.subjectMatthew Effecten_US
dc.subjectConcept Symbolsen_US
dc.subjectDefaultsen_US
dc.subjectDiffusionen_US
dc.subjectWomen in Scienceen_US
dc.titleThe Matthew effect and a relation with concept symbols and defaultsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:ALIS Vol.58(4) [December 2011]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ALIS 58(4) 335-345.pdf202.24 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.