Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/13712
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAgarwal, Charu-
dc.contributor.authorIlindra, Ambuj-
dc.contributor.authorKaradbhajne, Vijay-
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-09T13:06:22Z-
dc.date.available2012-03-09T13:06:22Z-
dc.date.issued2012-03-
dc.identifier.issn0975-0991 (Online); 0971-457X (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/13712-
dc.description149-151en_US
dc.description.abstractIn the present study, microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) has been used as a substitute for carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) in the manufacturing of liquid detergents with the aim to bring out a product comparable between the two derivatives of cellulose in terms of thickening property and cost economics. Liquid detergent samples are prepared in the laboratory as per standard formulation with different amounts of MCC and CMC. MCC is found to be superior to CMC, both as a thickening agent and in its cost effectiveness.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNISCAIR-CSIR, Indiaen_US
dc.rights CC Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Indiaen_US
dc.sourceIJCT Vol.19(2) [March 2012]en_US
dc.subjectCarboxymethyl Celluloseen_US
dc.subjectCost Economicsen_US
dc.subjectLiquid Detergenten_US
dc.subjectMicrocrystalline Celluloseen_US
dc.subjectThickeneren_US
dc.titleCarboxymethyl cellulose versus microcrystalline cellulose in the manufacturing of liquid detergentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:IJCT Vol.19(2) [March 2012]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
IJCT 19(2) 149-151.pdf46.7 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.