Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/1770Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Harinarayana, N.S. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Raghavan, K.S. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2008-07-31T09:54:25Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2008-07-31T09:54:25Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2008-06 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0972-5423 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1770 | - |
| dc.description | 91-100 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Examines the comparative retrieval effectiveness of the two packages, viz., CDS/ISIS and LibSys. A set of eight well defined parameters have been employed to compare the two packages. The result shows that neither of the two packages provide support for all the features that may be expected of ideal retrieval software. There appears to be some significant difference between CDS/ISIS and LibSys in terms of their ability to provide desirable features. There is a difference of 9.34% in the levels of performance of the two packages | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | CSIR | en_US |
| dc.source | ALIS Vol.55(2) [June 2008] | en_US |
| dc.title | Retrieval capabilities of CDS/ISIS and LibSys: a comparison | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | ALIS Vol.55(2) [June 2008] | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALIS 55(2) 91-100.pdf | 38.51 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.