Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/18833
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTalebi, S M-
dc.contributor.authorTaebi, A-
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-08T10:44:24Z-
dc.date.available2013-06-08T10:44:24Z-
dc.date.issued2004-07-
dc.identifier.issn0975-0991 (Online); 0971-457X (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/18833-
dc.description531-534en_US
dc.description.abstractThe efficiencies of three different extraction procedures including supercritical fluid extraction, accelerated solvent extraction, and soxhlet for extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from airborne particulate matter were investigated. Although the results obtained from the three methods and especially ASE and SFE were very close to each other, SFE was found as the most effective method for extraction of PAHs from airborne particulate matter. The effect of temperature on the efficiency of extraction of PAHs by SFE was also investigated and showed that the extraction efficiency can be improved by performing the extraction at higher temperatures.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNISCAIR-CSIR, Indiaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesC07C 15/00, B01D 11/00en_US
dc.rightsCC Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Indiaen_US
dc.sourceIJCT Vol.11(4) [July 2004]en_US
dc.subjectPolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonen_US
dc.subjectSFEen_US
dc.subjectASEen_US
dc.subjectAirborne particulate matteren_US
dc.titleComparison of SFE, ASE, and soxhlet extraction procedures for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons associated with airborne particulate matteren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:IJCT Vol.11(4) [July 2004]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
IJCT 11(4) 531-534.pdf795.16 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.