Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/25413
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRahman, M A-
dc.contributor.authorHossain, M A-
dc.contributor.authorMansur, M A-
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-09T10:30:09Z-
dc.date.available2014-01-09T10:30:09Z-
dc.date.issued2000-06-
dc.identifier.issn0975-1033 (Online); 0379-5136 (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/25413-
dc.description171-175en_US
dc.description.abstractA study was conducted to evaluate the overall quality in terms of proximate composition, rancidity, NPN (non protein nitrogen) content, protein digestibility, and sensory characteristics of hilsa (Hilsa ilisha) salted by different methods at ambient temperature (26-30°C). The salting methods included, salting of hilsa with dry crystalline salt, salting with previously prepared unsaturated brine (25g salt in 100ml water w/v) and salting with previously prepared saturated brine (dissolving salt in water until saturation). The hilsa salted with saturated brine showed longest shelf life (12 weeks) while the products by other two methods had shelf lives of 8 weeks only. Rancidity was maximum in the dry salted hilsa. The nonprotein nitrogen content was also highest in the dry salted fish . However, the sensory characteristics of the dry salted hilsa was the best among the three different types, although the sensory characteristics were altered after 8 weeks. Hilsa salted with saturated brine retained its sensory characteristics up to 12 weeks. Despite some biochemical changes and sensory characteristics, hilsa salted with saturated brine is good and ensures a longer shelf life.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNISCAIR-CSIR, Indiaen_US
dc.rights CC Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Indiaen_US
dc.sourceIJMS Vol.29(2) [June 2000]en_US
dc.titleEffect of different salting methods on the nutritional and sensory characteristics of hilsa (Hilsa ilisha)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:IJMS Vol.29(2) [June 2000]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
IJMS 29(2) 171-175.pdf1.19 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.