Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/27584
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorUdofia, Udofia Iton-
dc.contributor.authorNkereuwem, Edet E-
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-02T05:02:34Z-
dc.date.available2014-04-02T05:02:34Z-
dc.date.issued1995-09-
dc.identifier.issn0975-2404 (Online); 0972-5423 (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/27584-
dc.description96-100en_US
dc.description.abstractEach of the two methods of sample size determination - the Attribute and the Continuous Variable Method has its use in the investigation of social science problems. The former allows the computation of sample size with reference to any parameters of the variable and, therefore, can substitute for the Continuous Variable Method, but, with and probable increase in sample size. The later is very useful when data are collected in ratio form. However, it demands estimates of dispersion from the mean which may be primary purpose of the research in the first place. The Attribute Method is highly recommended for library and information science since it can be substituted for Continuous Variable Method.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNISCAIR-CSIR, Indiaen_US
dc.rights CC Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Indiaen_US
dc.sourceALIS Vol.42(3) [September 1995]en_US
dc.titleSample size determination: A comparison of attribute and continuous variable methodsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:ALIS Vol.42(3) [September 1995]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ALIS 42(3) 96-100.pdf1.07 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.