Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/28269Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Dutta, S | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-04-19T08:01:00Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2014-04-19T08:01:00Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 1969-03 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0975-2404 (Online); 0972-5423 (Print) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/28269 | - |
| dc.description | 32-34 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Describes the study carried out by Martin and Gilchrist to evaluate the British scientific journals, based on the data extracted from a special print out of the Science Citation Index (SCI). It is argued that since the output in SCI reflects the input policy, and as the citations in SCI will be predominantly in the subject field or pertain to the geographical region from which the source periodicals were selected, an evaluation based on SCI is likely to be biased. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | NISCAIR-CSIR, India | en_US |
| dc.rights |  CC Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 India | en_US |
| dc.source | ALIS Vol.16(1) [March 1969] | en_US |
| dc.title | Evaluation of scientific periodicals | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | ALIS Vol.16(1) [March 1969] | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALIS 16(1) 32-34.pdf | 725.69 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.