Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/28393Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Fomin, A A | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-04-19T10:43:36Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2014-04-19T10:43:36Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 1967-12 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0975-2404 (Online); 0972-5423 (Print) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/28393 | - |
| dc.description | 177-181 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Observations, in the light of some experiments, are made on the comparative efficiency of the UDC and descriptor retrieval systems. The grammar and logic of the two systems are analyzed and compared with search examples. It is claimed that UDC schedules can be taken as a basis for a universal thesaurus for all subjects in a generally accepted international language. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | NISCAIR-CSIR, India | en_US |
| dc.rights |  CC Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 India | en_US |
| dc.source | ALIS Vol.14(4) [December 1967] | en_US |
| dc.title | On the possibilities offered by UDC and some descriptor retrieval systems - A comparative study | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | ALIS Vol.14(4) [December 1967] | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALIS 14(4) 177-181.pdf | 911.4 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.