Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/29414
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGüler, Hande-
dc.contributor.authorÖzcan, Reşat-
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-18T11:26:44Z-
dc.date.available2014-09-18T11:26:44Z-
dc.date.issued2014-08-
dc.identifier.issn0975-1017 (Online); 0971-4588 (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/29414-
dc.description387-396en_US
dc.description.abstractNowadays, high strength steels are being increasingly used in the automotive industry and hot stamping of high strength steel plays an important role of light weighting without affecting the structural performances of final products. Unlike the cold stamping process, blank is formed and quenched, simultaneously during the hot stamping process. This affords the opportunity to manufacture components with complex geometric shapes and high strength. In this paper, the hot and cold forming simulations of a prototype model are processed with Usibor 1500 steel. The forming simulations are performed by DYNAFORM. For this purpose, tensile tests are implemented at elevated and room temperatures. Mat 106 and Mat 18 material models are selected for the hot and cold stampings, respectively. The results from the simulations show that the hot stamping process is safer than cold stamping.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNISCAIR-CSIR, Indiaen_US
dc.rights CC Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Indiaen_US
dc.sourceIJEMS Vol.21(4) [August 2014]en_US
dc.subjectHot stampingen_US
dc.subjectFinite element methoden_US
dc.subjectUsibor 1500en_US
dc.subjectSimulationen_US
dc.titleComparison of hot and cold stamping simulation of Usibor 1500 prototype modelen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:IJEMS Vol.21(4) [August 2014]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
IJEMS 21(4) 387-396.pdf485.28 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.