Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/29888
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Ranjeet R-
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Sushil K-
dc.contributor.authorRai, Gyanendra K-
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Khushboo-
dc.contributor.authorChoudhury, Madhumanthi-
dc.contributor.authorDhawan, Gaurav-
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Gyaneshwar P-
dc.contributor.authorGoswami, Suneha-
dc.contributor.authorPathak, Himanshu-
dc.contributor.authorRai, Raj D-
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-12T11:03:44Z-
dc.date.available2014-11-12T11:03:44Z-
dc.date.issued2014-10-
dc.identifier.issn0975-0959 (Online); 0301-1208 (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/29888-
dc.description396-406en_US
dc.description.abstractAntioxidant enzymes, besides being involved in various developmental processes, are known to be important for environmental stress tolerance in plants. In this study, the effect of treatment of 2.5 mM putrescine (Put), heat stress (HS -42°C for 2 h) and their combination on the expression and activity of antioxidant enzymes was studied at pre-anthesis in the leaves of two wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars — HDR77 (thermotolerant) and HD2329 (thermosusceptible). We observed that 2.5 mM Put before HS significantly enhanced the transcript levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), cytoplasmic and peroxisomal ascorbate peroxidase (cAPX, pAPX) in both the cultivars. However, the activities of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, APX and GR), as well as accumulation of antioxidants (ascorbic acid and total thiol content) were higher in HDR77 than in HD2329 in response to the treatment 2.5 mM Put + HS. No significant change was observed in the proline accumulation in response to HS and combined treatment of 2.5 mM Put + HS. A decrease in the H2O2 accumulation, lipid peroxidation and increase in cell membrane stability (CMS) were observed in response to 2.5 mM Put + HS treatment, as compared to HS treatment alone in both the cultivars; HDR77 was, however, more responsive to 2.5 mM Put + HS treatment. Put (2.5 mM) treatment at pre-anthesis thus modulated the defense mechanism responsible for the thermotolerance capacity of wheat under the heat stress. Elicitors like Put, therefore, need to be further studied for temporarily manipulating the thermotolerance capacity of wheat grown under the field conditions in view of the impending global climate change.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNISCAIR-CSIR, Indiaen_US
dc.rights CC Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Indiaen_US
dc.sourceIJBB Vol.51(5) [October 2014]en_US
dc.subjectHeat stressen_US
dc.subjectAntioxidantsen_US
dc.subjectPutrescineen_US
dc.subjectWheaten_US
dc.subjectAntioxidant enzymesen_US
dc.subjectQuantitative real-time PCRen_US
dc.subjectHeat shock proteinsen_US
dc.subjectTriticum aestivum L.en_US
dc.titleExogenous application of putrescine at pre-anthesis enhances the thermotolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:IJBB Vol.51(5) [October 2014]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
IJBB 51(5) 396-406.pdf443.55 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.