Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/30852
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVishwanatham, S-
dc.contributor.authorEmranuzzaman-
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-12T05:32:05Z-
dc.date.available2015-03-12T05:32:05Z-
dc.date.issued1998-07-
dc.identifier.issn0975-0991 (Online); 0971-457X (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/30852-
dc.description246-250en_US
dc.description.abstractThe corrosion inhibition efficiencies(IE%) of aniline(AL), p-toluidine(PTD), p-anisidine (PAD), p-phenitidine ( PPD) and N,N-dimethyl aniline(DMA) have been evaluated in 3% HF by weight loss and potentiostatic polarization methods. PAD is the best inhibitor and IE% can be classified in the following order: PAD> PPD > PTD > DMA > AL. The effect of temperature (range 303-333 K) on the corrosion behaviour of mild steel in plain HF solution and inhibited acid was also studied. The corrosion rate increased with increasing temperature both in uninhibited and inhibited acid and the values of IE% of all the inhibitors depend on temperature. The inhibitors act as mixed adsorption type inhibitors. Adsorption of AL, DMA and PTD on mild steel in 3% HF interface corresponds to Langmuir adsorption isotherm model while PAD and PPD appear to adsorb on the metal surface according to Temkin adsorption isotherm.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNISCAIR-CSIR, Indiaen_US
dc.rights CC Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Indiaen_US
dc.sourceIJCT Vol.05(4) [July 1998]en_US
dc.titleInhibition effect of some aniline compounds on corrosion of mild steel in 3% HFen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:IJCT Vol.05(4) [July 1998]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
IJCT 5(4) 246-250.pdf366.37 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.