Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/34809
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRajesh, S.-
dc.contributor.authorMajumdar, T. J.-
dc.contributor.authorKrishna, K. S.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-20T10:05:58Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-20T10:05:58Z-
dc.date.issued2015-06-
dc.identifier.issn0975-1033 (Online); 0379-5136 (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nopr.niscair.res.in/jspui/handle/123456789/34809-
dc.description783-794en_US
dc.description.abstractAmong the submarine ridge systems in the northern Indian Ocean, the 85oE Ridge in the Bay of Bengal is more enigmatic owing to its peculiar anomalous negative free-air gravity. In general, this has been attributed to the isostatic overcompensation of the ridge due to overburden sediment load. In this work we attempted to know; whether, the present day oceanic lithosphere, juxtaposed to the Eastern Continental Margin of India (ECMI), holds the vestiges of lithospheric stretching due to erstwhile India-Antarctica rifting? If so, how much is the gravity effect of post rift lithospheric subsidence contributed to the excess negative gravity field of later emplaced 85oE Ridge. Secondly, does the 85oE Ridge is a crustal mass anomaly? Or as envisaged, was it originated from the Crozet hotspot? We address these issues by using satellite altimeter-derived gravity anomaly and its analytical upward continuation anomalies with forward modeling of ship-borne data. Results on analytical continuation of anomalies at H = 150 to 200 km show that about 40% of existing negative gravity anomaly of the 85oE Ridge has contribution in long wavelength by the subsidence of mantle lithosphere; that plausibly arise as a consequence of rifting of the ECMI from its conjugate margin. Moreover, the absence of ridge anomaly at the same continuation heights also shows that its source is confined within the crust and the overcompensation processes caused crustal up-warping at the ridge flanks. Forward modeling studies show that the ridge crust has sagged into the mantle lithosphere. Unlike the hotspot originated Ninetyeast Ridge; the gravitational support of mantle lithosphere as sub-crustal low density mantle melt is absent for the case of the 85oE Ridge and hence negates its hotspot origin. However, the ridge anomalies are strongly present at lower continuation heights from H = 20 to 100 km and hence suggests its crustal genesis.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNISCAIR-CSIR, Indiaen_US
dc.rights CC Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Indiaen_US
dc.sourceIJMS Vol.44(06) [June 2015]en_US
dc.subjectFree-air gravityen_US
dc.subjectUpward continuationen_US
dc.subjectBay of Bengalen_US
dc.subject85oE Ridgeen_US
dc.subjectSatellite altimetryen_US
dc.titleLithospheric stretching and the long wavelength free-air gravity anomaly of the Eastern Continental Margin of India and the 85oE Ridge, Bay of Bengalen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:IJMS Vol.44(06) [June 2015]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
IJMS 44(6) 783-794.pdf1.63 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.