Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/37009
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBussmann, Rainer W-
dc.contributor.authorZambrana, Paniagua-
dc.contributor.authorNarel, Y-
dc.contributor.authorSikharulidze, Shalva-
dc.contributor.authorKikvidze, Zaal-
dc.contributor.authorKikodze, David-
dc.contributor.authorTchelidze, David-
dc.contributor.authorBatsatsashvili, Ketevan-
dc.contributor.authorHart-
dc.contributor.authorRobbie, E-
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-11T04:25:52Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-11T04:25:52Z-
dc.date.issued2017-01-
dc.identifier.issn0975-1068 (Online); 0972-5938 (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/37009-
dc.description7-24en_US
dc.description.abstractSamtskhe-Javakheti was formed in the 1990s in southern Georgia from the historical provinces of Meskheti, Javakheti and Tori. The majority of the inhabitants are ethnically Armenian, with a Georgian minority. We documented traditional plant use in Samtskhe-Javakheti, and hypothesized that (1) plant use knowledge in general would be higher in isolated high elevation communities, and that (2) use of home gardens would be much more restricted to lower elevations. Fieldwork was conducted July–August 2013, July–August 2014, and September–October 2015, using semi-structured questionnaires. We encountered 261 plant species belonging to 161 genera of 70 families being used in the region. Of these, 160 species were exclusively wild-collected, 81 grown in homegardens, and 20 were both grown in gardens and collected wild. Most species and uses were widely used across the region, with some particular species in the low lying villages, that allowed a wider variety of species to be grown and gathered. The elevation of informant community significantly fit the ordination in plant-space and use-space. In addition, community significantly fit the ordination for both plant-space and use-space. Informant age significantly fit the plant-space ordination only, while informant gender was not significant in either space.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNISCAIR-CSIR, Indiaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInt. Cl.8: A61K 36/00en_US
dc.rights CC Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Indiaen_US
dc.sourceIJTK Vol.16(1) [January 2017en_US
dc.subjectCaucasusen_US
dc.subjectPlant useen_US
dc.subjectLinguistic ethnobotanyen_US
dc.subjectTraditional knowledgeen_US
dc.subjectPost soviet developmenten_US
dc.titleEthnobotany of Samtskhe-Javakheti, Sakartvelo (Republic of Georgia), Caucasusen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:IJTK Vol.16(1) [January 2017]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
IJTK 16(1) 7-24.pdf307.79 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.