Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/40804
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTabassum, Sadaf-
dc.contributor.authorHossen, Md. Alomgir-
dc.contributor.authorYousuf, Farzana-
dc.contributor.authorElahi, Naeema-
dc.contributor.authorHossain, Md. Yeamin-
dc.contributor.authorPramanik, Md. Nasir Uddin-
dc.contributor.authorNawer, Fairuz-
dc.contributor.authorYahya, Khairun-
dc.contributor.authorBahkali, Ali H.-
dc.contributor.authorElgorban, Abdallah M.-
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-17T06:15:03Z-
dc.date.available2017-03-17T06:15:03Z-
dc.date.issued2017-03-
dc.identifier.issn0975-1033 (Online); 0379-5136 (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/40804-
dc.description562-568en_US
dc.description.abstractThe present study focuses on the temporal variations of condition through multiple functions (allometric, KA; Fulton's, KF; relative, KR) and prey-predator status through relative weight (WR) for two halfbeaks, Hemiramphus archipelagicus (Collette & Parin, 1978) and Hemiramphus lutkei (Valenciennes, 1847) using the monthly samples from the Karachi Coast of Pakistan during January to December 2014. The smallest individual was 14.0 cm in TL for both species, but the largest individuals were 23.5 in TL for H. archipelagicus and 27.8 cm in TL for H. lutkei. The BW ranged from 8.0-27.4 g for H. archipelagicus and 7.0-37.4 g for H. lutkei. There was significant differences in length-frequency distributions (LFDs) between two species (P<0.001). The KF was highly correlated with TL for both species (Spearman rank test, P<0.001). Therefore, it is suggested that KF is the best condition factor for assessing the wellbeing of this two Halfbeaks in the Karachi Coast of Pakistan. There was no significant relationships between TL vs. KA (rs=-0.0264, P=0.056 for H. archipelagicus and rs=-0.0883, P=0.855), TL vs. KR (rs=-0.0108, P=0.813 for H. archipelagicus and rs= 0.0235, P=0.608) and TL vs. WR (rs=-0.0099, P=0.828 for H. archipelagicus and rs=0.0235, P=0.608 for H. lutkei), but significant relationships were found in TL vs. KF, BW vs. KA,BW vs. KF, BW vs. KR and BW vs. WR (P<0.001) for both species. In addition, the WR was not significantly different from 100 (Wilcoxon signed rank test , P=0.654 for H. archipelagicus and P=0.405 for H. lutkei) for both Halfbeaks in the Karachi Coast of Pakistan, indicating the habitat is still in balance condition with the good combination of prey and predators.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNISCAIR-CSIR, Indiaen_US
dc.rights CC Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Indiaen_US
dc.sourceIJMS Vol.46(03) [March 2017]en_US
dc.subjectHalfbeaken_US
dc.subjectRelative weighten_US
dc.subjectMultiple condition factorsen_US
dc.subjectKarachi Coasten_US
dc.subjectPakistanen_US
dc.titleTemporal variations of condition and prey-predator status for two Halfbeaks (Hemiramphus archipelagicus and H. lutkei) in the Karachi Coast of Pakistan through multi-model inferenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:IJMS Vol.46(03) [March 2017]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
IJMS 46(3) 562-568.pdf174.88 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.