Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/41650
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKumar, M.Vignesh-
dc.contributor.authorYarrakula, Kiran-
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-08T08:21:52Z-
dc.date.available2017-05-08T08:21:52Z-
dc.date.issued2017-05-
dc.identifier.issn0975-1033 (Online); 0379-5136 (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/41650-
dc.description1008-1021en_US
dc.description.abstractIn the present study, EO-1 hyperion data is used for processing. Out of 242 bands, 163 bands are taken in the calibrating condition. To extract the vegetation and mineralogy from hyperion imagery needs various preprocessing steps such as bad bands removal, destriping, radiometric calibration and reflectance generation. Vertical destriping process is performed with local destriping algorithm. Radiance of the imagery generates in the BIL format at the scale factor of 0.1. Log residuals, flat field correction, IARR, QUAC and FLAASH atmospheric correction methods are used to remove error from bands and generate the reflectance. Comparative analysis is also performed on various atmospheric corrections. Results showed that FLAASH is the efficient atmospheric correction method compared to other methods.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNISCAIR-CSIR, Indiaen_US
dc.rights CC Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Indiaen_US
dc.sourceIJMS Vol.46(05) [May 2017]en_US
dc.subjectQUACen_US
dc.subjectFLAASHen_US
dc.subjectFlat fielden_US
dc.subjectIARRen_US
dc.subjectDestripeen_US
dc.titleComparison of efficient techniques of hyper-spectral image preprocessing for mineralogy and vegetation studiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:IJMS Vol.46(05) [May 2017]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
IJMS 46(5) 1008-1021.pdf1.64 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.