Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/44489
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJain, Rahi-
dc.contributor.authorRao, Bakul-
dc.contributor.authorMishra, Satanand-
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-01T06:23:36Z-
dc.date.available2018-06-01T06:23:36Z-
dc.date.issued2018-06-
dc.identifier.issn0975-1033 (Online); 0379-5136 (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/44489-
dc.description1148-1153en_US
dc.description.abstractPresent study is to compare the antibiotic removal efficiency of different antibiotics by different adsorbents. It used three types of adsorbents namely non-ionic adsorbent, cation exchange adsorbent and anion exchange adsorbent for five different types of anti-bacterial antibiotics. Measurement is done using uv-visible spectrophotometer. The study found that ionic adsorbents are better as compared to non-ionic adsorbent in removal of antibiotics. It is observed that sulphamethoxazole, penicillin, rifampicin and aspirin removal efficiency is better for anion exchange adsorbent, and for tetracyline removal is better cation exchange adsorbent.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNISCAIR-CSIR, Indiaen_US
dc.rights CC Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Indiaen_US
dc.sourceIJMS Vol.47(06) [June 2018]en_US
dc.subjectAntibiotic removalen_US
dc.subjectCulturingen_US
dc.subjectAdsorptionen_US
dc.subjectIonic adsorptionen_US
dc.subjectResin-based removalen_US
dc.titleComparative analysis of antibiotic residue removal efficiency of different type of adsorbentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:IJMS Vol.47(06) [June 2018]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
IJMS 47(6) 1148-1153.pdf292.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.