Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/5389
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBungay, Henry R-
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-20T11:43:50Z-
dc.date.available2009-07-20T11:43:50Z-
dc.date.issued2005-11-
dc.identifier.issn0975-1084 (Online); 0022-4456 (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/5389-
dc.description928-930en_US
dc.description.abstractAll countries have unused biomass resources. Some are wastes with costs for disposal, but others are cultivated and collected. Because arable lands are not abundant and vary greatly in fertility, access to water, harvesting cost, and transportation costs, the decisions about what biomass to collect and how to use it must be wise. It is naive to view biomass as the panacea for the coming energy crisis because there is not enough in practical locations and the costs involved in retrieving and refining it will be relatively high. Major thrusts for commercialization of biomass refining are imminent, and fuel ethanol, despite its enormous potential, market may not be the most profitable product. Comparison of some developing countries shows wide differences in their problems and potential solutions.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCSIRen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesC08B 1/08en_US
dc.sourceJSIR Vol.64(11) [November 2005]en_US
dc.subjectAlcohol fuelsen_US
dc.subjectBiomassen_US
dc.subjectBioenergyen_US
dc.subjectBiomass refiningen_US
dc.subjectBioconversionen_US
dc.subjectConversion technologiesen_US
dc.subjectCellulose hydrolysisen_US
dc.titleBiomass energy priority for developing nationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:JSIR Vol.64(11) [November 2005]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
JSIR 64(11) 928-930.pdf45.67 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.