Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/58373
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDhuru, Neha D-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-01T10:01:26Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-01T10:01:26Z-
dc.date.issued2021-07-
dc.identifier.issn0975-1076 (Online); 0971-7544 (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/58373-
dc.description213-219en_US
dc.description.abstractThe theme of this paper is Genericide of Geographical Indications. It traces the historical foundation for evolution of Geographical Indications as an Intellectual Property. It reflects on the concept of ‘property’ and ‘intellectual property’ as elucidated by Salmond in his legal classic on Jurisprudence and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. The role of TRIPS in catalysing the enactment of a ‘sui generis’ legislation on Geographical Indications in India i.e., The Geographical Indication of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999. It discusses a field trip undertaken by the writer to understand the GI potential of a specific variety of rice cereal ‘Zinnia 31’ (Wada Kolam).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNIScPR-CSIR, Indiaen_US
dc.sourceJIPR Vol.26(4) [July 2021]en_US
dc.subjectIntellectual Propertyen_US
dc.subjectGeographical Indicationsen_US
dc.subjectGenericide of Geographical Indicationsen_US
dc.subject‘Zinnia 31’ (Wada Kolam)en_US
dc.titleGenericide, A Quintessential Outcome of Ignoring Passing off or Infringement of Geographical Indicationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:JIPR Vol.26(4) [July 2021]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
JIPR 26(4) 213-219.pdf420.01 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.