Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/60177
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMor, Aman-
dc.contributor.authorBansal, N K-
dc.contributor.authorDhanger, Parveen-
dc.contributor.authorBhadu, Sushil-
dc.contributor.authorKarwasra, Nitin-
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-28T10:46:31Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-28T10:46:31Z-
dc.date.issued2022-07-
dc.identifier.issn0975-1068 (Online); 0972-5938 (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/60177-
dc.description677-684en_US
dc.description.abstractThe research was planned to predict the performance and ergonomic assessment of different types (tractor operated weeder, the engine operated inter-row rotary weeder, tractor-drawn high clearance cultivator, and manual hand hoe) weeder in cotton crop. The experimental study consists of five treatments. Weeding operations were done at three stages (pre-square, square and flowering) of the cotton crop and the performance parameter was recorded. The highest weeding efficiency was found in manual hand hoe (Kasola) with 85.50-89.59% whereas efficiency varied from 74-76% in tractor operated weeders. Crop parameters were also recorded. Plant height and canopy at the flowering stage differ significantly and plant height was found significant at the square stage also. In all treatments, after weeding pulse rate varies from 104-122 beats/min. The engine operated power weeder resulted in more blood pressure (142/90) than the manual weeder (135/88). So from the results obtained, the tractor operated inter-row rotary weeder (M2) was found best and recommended.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNIScPR-CSIR, Indiaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInt Cl.22: A01B 1/00, A01B 39/19en_US
dc.sourceIJTK Vol.21(3) [July 2022]en_US
dc.subjectCottonen_US
dc.subjectCrop parameteren_US
dc.subjectHand hoeen_US
dc.subjectPulse rateen_US
dc.subjectWeederen_US
dc.titleComparative performance and ergonomic assessment of different types of weeder for better adaptability of machineen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:IJTK Vol.21(3) [July 2022]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
IJTK Vol.21(3) 677-684.pdf642.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.