Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/67124
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAhmed Khan, Zubair-
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Jivitesh-
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-15T09:42:14Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-15T09:42:14Z-
dc.date.issued2026-01-
dc.identifier.issn0975-1076 (Online) ; 0971-7544 (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/67124-
dc.description110-120en_US
dc.description.abstractThe study explores the evolution of patent damages and its transformative nature in Indian jurisprudence, with a focus on compensation and deterrence mechanisms. Historically, Indian courts have been hesitant to award substantial damages, favoring injunctions due to limited precedents and challenges in quantifying losses. Recent landmark judgments by the Delhi High Court, alongside the Intellectual Property Division Rules of 2022, signal a shift towards more structured damage calculations, including lost profits, royalty rates, and aggravated damages. By comparing practices in India, the US, and Europe, this paper highlights the growing alignment of Indian courts with global standards. These developments strengthen patent enforcement, incentivize innovation, and set a critical precedent for intellectual property law in India.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNIScPR-CSIR,Indiaen_US
dc.sourceJIPR Vol.31(1) [January 2026]en_US
dc.subjectPatent Damagesen_US
dc.subjectInfringementen_US
dc.subjectLost Profiten_US
dc.subjectRoyality Ratesen_US
dc.titleEvolving Landscape of Patent Damages in India: A Comparative Analysis with US and EP Jurisdictionsen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.56042/jipr.v31i1.16968en_US
Appears in Collections:JIPR Vol.31(1) [January 2026]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
JIPR Vol.31(1) 2026 110-120.pdf263.53 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.