Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/67750
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLairenjam, Joyshree-
dc.contributor.authorJ, Anjana-
dc.contributor.authorJullita Devi, Soraisham-
dc.contributor.authorKumar Singh, Potsangbam-
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-29T06:09:38Z-
dc.date.available2026-04-29T06:09:38Z-
dc.date.issued2026-04-
dc.identifier.issn0975-1068 (Online) ; 0972-5938 (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/67750-
dc.description359-369en_US
dc.description.abstractIn the recent year in Manipur, especially among the rural communities, there is considerably high prevalence of urolithiasis, affecting approximately 22.4% of the population. Despite being this high incidence, there has been very less systematic documentation of the traditional herbal practices used by the indigenous healers to manage this condition. Therefore, the current study aimed to document and analyse the ethnomedicinal plants used in traditional practitioners for the treatment of urolithiasis in the selected rural areas of Manipur. The research was conducted over a period of six months in the five villages located in the Imphal West and Bishnupur districts of Manipur. The ethnomedicinal information was collected through semi-structured interviews with the traditional healers and knowledgeable local elders. The plant species mention during the interviews were noted, collected, identified taxonomically by expert taxonomist using standard botanical keys, and preserved as herbarium. The recorded data were quantitatively analysed using Frequency of Citation (FC), Relative Frequency of Citation (RFC), and Family Use Value (FUV). The study documented 15 ethnomedicinal plant species belonging to 15 different plant families. Among the documented plants, Potentilla indica (Andrews) Th. Wolf. was the most cited plant (RFC=0.575; FC=21.83), followed by Plantago major L. (RFC=0.303), Benincasa hispida (Thunb.) Cogn. (RFC=0.333), and Allium odorum L (RFC=0.303). The leaves were most commonly used plant part, accounting for 36.84% of total preparations reported by the healers. Demographic analysis revealed that the majority of the respondents were male (75.76%), and a significant proportion were elders above 50 years of age (51.52%), indicating that the knowledge of ethnomedical is primarily pass on orally within the older generation of the healer community. The therapeutic relevance of the documented plants may be attributed to the presence of bioactive phytochemicals such as flavonoids, terpenoids, alkaloids, and saponins, which are known to possess antioxidant, diuretic, and anti-crystallization properties.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNIScPR-CSIR,indiaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInt Cl.26: A61K 36/00en_US
dc.sourceIJTK Vol.25(04) [April 2026]en_US
dc.subjectEthnomedicineen_US
dc.subjectIndigenous knowledgeen_US
dc.subjectKidney stonesen_US
dc.subjectManipuren_US
dc.subjectTraditional healersen_US
dc.subjectUrolithiasisen_US
dc.titleMedicinal plants used in traditional healthcare in Manipur: Ethnomedical insights into Urolithiasis treatmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.56042/ijtk.v25i4.22529en_US
Appears in Collections:IJTK Vol.25(04) [April 2026]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
IJTK Vol-25(4) 359-369.pdf1.24 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.