Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/67800
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJovanović, Aleksandar-
dc.contributor.authorSimjanović, Dušan-
dc.contributor.authorLukić, Vladimir-
dc.contributor.authorMilić, Petar-
dc.contributor.authorSavić, Dragan-
dc.contributor.authorZdravković, Nemanja-
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-18T04:35:42Z-
dc.date.available2026-05-18T04:35:42Z-
dc.date.issued2026-02-
dc.identifier.issn0975-1084 (Online) ; 0022-4456 (Print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/67800-
dc.description115-127en_US
dc.description.abstractIn today’s cloud solution deployments, an important question to consider is whether your development and delivery infrastructure is genuinely secure when using standard security scanning methods and depending on the security protocols of major data providers like AWS, Google, Microsoft Azure, and Kubernetes for application deployment. The references analyzed on common threats in cloud environments and existing solutions, instantiated a need for a survey among 50 software professionals with varied experience in cloud and traditional security to be conducted. The findings highlighted the need for the ranking of common cloud threats in software development for cloud platforms by using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) analysis. The results indicate that safeguarding cloud environments demands a multifaceted approach that addresses the nuanced challenges posed by out-of-date applications, operating system vulnerabilities, and third-party apps, all while remaining vigilant against other miscellaneous threats. Notably, third-party applications, while speeding up software delivery, pose significant security risks. This supports the “shifting left” paradigm, which emphasizes integrating security early in the development cycle. Additionally, the importance of a protective layer between hosts and containers through a common response protocol is determined. Docker accounts for 54.7% of the total deployment, showing that more than half of the respondents deployed container images using Docker. With values of 0.526 with λ = 0.5 of FAHP (Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process), experts were either not sure or declared containers as non-repudiable, showing that programmers do not know if the container is the one it poses to be.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNIScPR-CSIR, Indiaen_US
dc.sourceJSIR Vol.85(02) [February 2026]en_US
dc.subjectAnalytic hierarchy processen_US
dc.subjectDockeren_US
dc.subjectFuzzy analytic hierarchy processen_US
dc.subjectFuzzy logicen_US
dc.subjectSecurityen_US
dc.titleAn Insight from A Programmer’s Perspective on Cloud Container Security Architectureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.56042/jsir.v85i2.14212en_US
Appears in Collections:JSIR Vol.85(02) [February 2026]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
JSIR 85(2) 115-127.pdf1.25 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in NOPR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.